<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1.0</version>
  <type>video</type>
  <title>Women Filmmakers by Karen Ward Mahar &amp; Lulu in Hollywood — Book Review</title>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Before the studio system locked women out of the director&apos;s chair, Hollywood&apos;s silent era was surprisingly open to female talent. In this video I dig into two books that, together, paint a vivid picture of that lost golden age — and its abrupt end.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Karen Ward Mahar&apos;s &quot;Women Filmmakers in Early Hollywood&quot; (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006) is a meticulously researched business history that explains why women thrived as directors, writers, and producers between roughly 1908 and 1916 — and why they were almost entirely pushed out once Wall Street money and a rigid studio system took over by the mid-1920s. Mahar traces the industry from its &quot;masculinized&quot; technological roots in the 1890s, through the theater-influenced egalitarianism of the nickelodeon boom, to the &quot;remasculinization&quot; of filmmaking that followed. Along the way she covers figures like Alice Guy-Blaché, Lois Weber, Mary Pickford, and Mabel Normand, using them to show how shifting economics — not talent or ambition — decided who got to make movies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pairing that with Louise Brooks&apos; &quot;Lulu in Hollywood&quot; (Knopf, 1982) gives the theory a human face. Brooks — the icon behind Pandora&apos;s Box — wrote these seven autobiographical essays decades after her career ended, looking back at Old Hollywood with a sharp, often unsentimental eye. From her early days as a Denishawn and Ziegfeld dancer to her run-ins with Chaplin, W.C. Fields, and G.W. Pabst, Brooks writes as someone who lived through the very industry Mahar analyzes from the outside — someone who found, and eventually lost, her own creative power within it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read side by side, these two books work as a perfect one-two punch: Mahar gives you the structural &quot;why,&quot; Brooks gives you the lived &quot;what it felt like.&quot; Together they&apos;re essential reading for anyone interested in the real, well-documented history of women in early film — not the sanitized version.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Books discussed:&lt;br /&gt;– Karen Ward Mahar, &quot;Women Filmmakers in Early Hollywood&quot; (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006)&lt;br /&gt;– Louise Brooks, &quot;Lulu in Hollywood&quot; (Knopf, 1982)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <thumbnail_url>https://vod.salto.nl/img/2026/07/31/6a6cab2dd8520c0013255778_screenshot_1.jpg</thumbnail_url>
  <thumbnail_width>1280</thumbnail_width>
  <thumbnail_height>720</thumbnail_height>
  <width>1280</width>
  <height>720</height>
  <html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://vod.salto.nl/embed/1emSBAv2uoo04IygOQIs64&quot; width=&quot;1280&quot; height=&quot;720&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <provider_name>Salto Player</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://vod.salto.nl</provider_url>
</oembed>